تقبل الله طاعتكم عرايس
حد منكم سمع عن جهاز فيليبس لازالة الشعر
او جربه
؟
ماجربته بس في ناس تمدح وناس تذم وناس تقول عادي
بس اهوا ترا يزيل الشعر بالضوء مو ليزر
هذي وحده اجنبيه كاتبه تجربتها و مقيمته ب 3 نجوم
3.0 out of 5 stars Useful, but does not compare to salon laser hair removal
As someone who has been having laser hair removal in a salon for several years, I am impressed with the quality of the Philips Lumea. The instructions are very simple and helpful so even if you're a bit of a technophobe you'll have the machine ready to use in no time. I used it first on my bikini area with very satisfactory results. At first I had some difficulty in activating the Lumea as the bursts of pulsed light are trigged by depressing small segments positioned around the head of the machine against one's skin. The bikini line is a curvy area and presented a problem at first. However, I discovered that, by rolling the machine from front to back over the skin, the mechanism fired. That problem overcome, I found that it took very little time to treat the bikini-line and there was no great discomfort of excessive heat when using the machine. I would imagine the Lumea is less cumbersome to use on legs and underarms, but it can apparently take an hour to treat both legs.
After a couple of treatments, I can attest that the Lumea does seem to repress normal hair growth. Having used no other methods of hair removal over the past month, my regrowth is very slow which is remarkable for someone like me with very thick fast-growing hair. However, although the Lumea is a very useful device to use in the home it is not a substitute for salon laser hair removal. First of all the Lumea uses Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) which is generally considered to be less effective than laser. Second, no home device, whether laser or IPL, can be as powerful or effective as a salon laser. I have had numerous laser salon treatments on my legs, underarms and stomach and, yes, it is painful and expensive but the results are excellent and hair reduction is permanent. If you are very hairy and are desperate, like I was, to truly eliminate your hair problem, treatment in a salon with a laser is the way to go. You'll save yourself some pain and money with the Lumea but the results are not permanent and you'll have to treat areas every two to four weeks to remain smooth, as the manufacturers admit themselves.
Compared to other home methods of hair removal, however, the Lumea definitely has the advantage. It is quicker, longer-lasting and less painful than waxing or epilating and is miles better than shaving. If you're a regular shaver but find, like me, that shaving irritates the skin and only keeps you smooth for one day, you'll probably find the Lumea a lifesaver. As for other home laser/IPL devices, I have used the Tria home laser before, which tends to be a bit more expensive and takes longer to use than the Lumea but does give superior results since it uses laser and not IPL.
So, whether or not I recommend the Lumea really depends on the sort of results you're looking for. If you're a waxer or shaver and are just wanting something a bit longer lasting and less of a hassle, I couldn't recommend the Lumea strongly enough. If, however, you have serious hair problems and want it sorted out for good I'm afraid there's yet to be a home laser/IPL device that can compare to a salon one. You also need to consider whether your skin and hair type is suitable. I'm an ideal candidate, having very pale skin and very dark, thick hair, which is why the Lumea works well on me. If you have dark skin or pale or fine hair, you may find the Lumea a disappointment.